Volume 15, Issue 1 (Spring 2020)                   Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing 2020, 15(1): 27-14 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mehri S, Hosseini M A, Fallahi-Khoshknab M, Mohammadi Shahbelaghi F, Akbari Zardkhaneh S. Clarification of Ageism in the Care System. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2020; 15 (1) :27-14
URL: http://salmandj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-1816-en.html
1- Department of Nursing, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. , mohammadifarahnaz@gmail.com
Full-Text [PDF 7089 kb]   (824 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2365 Views)
Full-Text:   (391 Views)
Introduction
iscrimination in the provision of care to the elderly due to their advanced age is called age discrimination. Butler first defined the issue in 1969 as "prejudice against one age group over other age groups" [1]. Age discrimination leads to the misconception that providing care to the elderly is not important enough [2]. Therefore, age discrimination against the elderly in health care centers could have harmful consequences and weaken the health status of the elderly [3].
On the other hand, evidence has shown that caregivers are unaware of their discriminatory treatment of the elderly [2, 4]. Providing quality care depends on having sufficient knowledge about the concepts, dimensions and characteristics of the care [5]. A review of the conducted researches also showed the existence of multiple definitions and ambiguities in the concept of age discrimination. Different definitions cause ambiguity in understanding a concept. Based on the fact that the analysis of a concept in a scientific way can help to create a clear picture of it [6], the present study was conducted with the aim of analyzing the concept of age discrimination in the field of care system.
2. Methods & Materials 
This research was a review study that was performed using the eight-step approach of Walker and Avant concept analysis [7]. The steps of concept analysis in this approach included: concept selection; determining the purpose of the analysis; identification of all possible uses of the concept; creation of the defining attributes; identification of model case of the concept; identification of the borderline, adversarial and innovative cases; identification of antecedents and consequences; and definition of empirical referents [7].
To search for sources, the keyword “ageism” was first searched in Pubmed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, CINAHL, Irandoc, Magiran, and SID databases (from 1969 to September 2018). The Google Scholar search engine also was searched for related articles. In addition, a manual search was performed on the selected articles’ references.
Inclusion criteria of the articles (in Persian and English) included studies discussing the following: age discrimination in hospital care; causes, backgrounds and consequences of age discrimination; and, a general definition or description of age discrimination. A total of 342 articles were found in the initial search.
First the titles and then the abstracts were reviewed and a number of articles were deleted. Then, the remaining articles were reviewed independently by two researchers to determine the inclusion and exclusion criteria. After reviewing the selected studies, finally 20 articles were used for concept analysis. Articles unrelated to care and age discrimination were excluded.
The reasons for choosing the concept of age discrimination were: the increasing number of the elderly referred to hospitals; existence of many problems in clinical care of the elderly [8]; recommendation of the World Health Organization to combat the phenomenon of age discrimination [9]; the effect of societal values and culture on the concept of age discrimination [10]; the need to introduce this concept to all health care providers; and finally, the lack of research on this concept in Iran [11].
3. Results 
Butler's classic definition of age discrimination has been widely used since 1969 [1, 12]. It is believed that age discrimination has three dimensions: stereotypes (cognitive dimension), prejudice (emotional dimension) and discrimination (behavioral dimension) [11]. In a 2009 study, Iverson described age discrimination as prejudice, stereotyped behavior, and discrimination against old people or groups known as the elderly [13].
In his 2017 study, Sao José added two other aspects to Iverson's definition, including self-directed discrimination and other-directed discrimination [14]. The present research on the definitions and applications of the concept of age discrimination showed its important features as follows:
• Age discrimination is a discriminatory process against the elderly [6, 12, 13, 15, 16].
• It can have a positive or negative aspect [12, 13, 15-17].
• It can be conscious or unconscious [12, 13, 15-17].
• It is manifested in cognitive, emotional and behavioral dimensions [12, 13, 15-17].
• It can exist at low, medium and high levels [12, 13,  16, 17].
• It can be self-directed or other-directed [2, 6, 12,  14, 16].
The causes of age discrimination can be rooted in individuals, society, culture and government policies [18-20]. Therefore, the antecedents that lead to discrimination in providing care to the elderly were identified as follows: a. The presence of the elderly in care centers to receive care; b. Caregivers with negative beliefs and attitudes towards the elderly, which lead to discriminatory behaviors towards the elderly.
These are among the main consequences of age discrimination: endangering the health of the elderly; reducing the quality of care; exacerbating the disease; increasing the cost of care; unsafe care environment; abuse of the elderly; increased dissatisfaction with the hospital; escape from hospital and obstruction of medical communication of the elderly [20, 21]. Also, the Fraboni [22], Yilmaz [23] and Kogan [24] scales have been used in most studies to measure age discrimination.
4. Conclusion
The present study defined age discrimination as “discrimination against or for the benefit of the elderly in adult care centers; this means that health care providers (overtly and covertly, or guided by the elderly themselves or by another person) discriminate in the quantity and quality of care provided to the elderly compared to other age groups.
This study, because it clarified the concept of age discrimination in Iran for the first time, can be the basis for further research to build tools for measuring age discrimination and conducting intervention studies in this regard. Also, this study can be an introduction to conduct preventive measures and improve the quality of care provided to the elderly. In addition, due to the fact that the self-directed dimension has recently been added to other dimensions of age discrimination concept, further studies are suggested to clarify this dimension.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

All ethical principles in this article have been approved by the ethics committee of the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences with the Code IR.USWR.REC.1396.263.
Funding
The paper was extracted from the PhD. thesis of Saeid Mehriin at the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran.
Authors' contributions
All authors were equally contributed in preparing this article.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.


References
Nelson TD. Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of Social Issues. 2005; 61(2):207-21. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00402.x]
Ayalon L. Perceived age, gender, and racial/ethnic discrimination in Europe: Results from the European social survey. Educational Gerontology. 2014; 40(7):499-517. [DOI:10.1080/03601277.2013.845490]
Lui NL, Wong CH. Junior doctors’ attitudes towards older adults and its correlates in a tertiary-care public hospital. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore. 2009; 38(2):125-9.
Statistical center of Iran. [Internet]. https://www.amar.org.ir 
Sum S, Emamian S, Sefidchian A. Aging educational program to reduce ageism: intergenerational approach. Elderly Health Journal. 2016; 2(1):33-8.
Levy SR. Toward reducing ageism: Positive Education About Aging and Contact Experiences (PEACE) model. The Gerontologist. 2016; 58(2):226-32. [DOI:10.1093/geront/gnw116] [PMID]
Butler RN. Ageism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist. 1969; 9(1):243-6. [DOI:10.1093/geront/9.4_Part_1.243] [PMID]
Butler RN. Ageism: A foreword. Journal of Social Issues. 1980; 36(2):8-11. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1980.tb02018.x]
Pekince H, Aslan H, Erci B, Akturk U. The attitudes of healthcare professionals in a state hospital towards ageism. Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg. 2018; 26(1):109-17. [DOI:10.1007/s10389-017-0849-5]
Eymard AS, Douglas DH. Ageism among health care providers and interventions to improve their attitudes toward older adults: an integrative review. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 2012; 38(5):26-35. [DOI:10.3928/00989134-20120307-09] [PMID]
Mohammadi MM, Esmaeilivand M. [Attitudes toward caring of the elderly from the perspective of nursing and midwifery students in Kermanshah province in 2015 (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2017; 11(4):476-83. [DOI:10.21859/sija-1104476]
Kydd A, Fleming A. Ageism and age discrimination in health care: Fact or fiction? A narrative review of the literature. Maturitas. 2015; 81(4):432-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.05.002] [PMID]
Economist Intelligence Unit. Healthcare strategies for an ageing society. London: The Economist; 2009. 
Ayalon L, Tesch-Romer C. Contemporary perspectives on ageism. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2018. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8] [PMID] [PMCID]
Branch LG, Harris DK, Palmore EB. Encyclopedia of ageism. United States: Haworth Pastoral Press; 2005.
Bonnie RJ, Wallace RB. Elder mistreatment: Abuse, neglect, and exploitation in an aging America. Washington, D.C.,: National Academies Press; 2003.
Wilkinson JA. Thirty years of ageism research: Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2004.
Sao Jose JMS, Amado CAF, Ilinca S, Buttigieg SC, Taghizadeh Larsson A. Ageism in health care: A systematic review of operational definitions and inductive conceptualizations. The Gerontologist. 2019; 59(2):98-108. [DOI:10.1093/geront/gnx020] [PMID]
Greenberg J, Schimel J, Martens A. Ageism: Denying the face of the future: Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2002.
Montepare JM, Zebrowitz LA. A social-developmental view of ageism: Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2002.
Iversen TN, Larsen L, Solem PE. A conceptual analysis of ageism. Nordic Psychology. 2009; 61(3):4-22. [DOI:10.1027/1901-2276.61.3.4]
Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. United States: Upper Saddle River, Pearson/Pretice Hall. 2011.
Powers BA, Knapp TR. Dictionary of nursing theory and research. United States: Springer Publishing Company; 2010.
Kim JH, Han J. The comparison of strategies combating ageism among Korea, Japan, and US. Korean Journal of Sociology. 2012; 46(3):93-113.
Officer A, de la Fuente-Nunez V. A global campaign to combat ageism. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2018; 96(4):295-6. [DOI:10.2471/BLT.17.202424] [PMID] [PMCID]
Officer A, Schneiders ML, Wu D, Nash P, Thiyagarajan JA, Beard JR. Valuing older people: time for a global campaign to combat ageism. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2016; 94(10):710-1. [DOI:10.2471/BLT.16.184960] [PMID] [PMCID]
Cuddy AJ, Fiske ST, Kwan VS, Glick P, Demoulin S, Leyens JP, et al. Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2009; 48(1):1-33. [DOI:10.1348/014466608X314935] [PMID] [PMCID]
McKenna H. Nursing theories and models. Abingdon: Routledge; 2006. [DOI:10.4324/9780203135440]
Hansen BR, Hodgson NA, Gitlin LN. It’sa matter of trust: Older African Americans speak about their health care encounters. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2016; 35(10):1058-76. [DOI:10.1177/0733464815570662] [PMID] [PMCID]
Higgins I, Der Riet PV, Slater L, Peek C. The negative attitudes of nurses towards older patients in the acute hospital setting: A qualitative descriptive study. Contemporary Nurse. 2007; 26(2):225-37. [DOI:10.5172/conu.2007.26.2.225] [PMID]
Hubbard RE, Lyons RA, Woodhouse KW, Hillier SL, Wareham K, Ferguson B, et al. Absence of ageism in access to critical care: a cross‐sectional study. Age and Ageing. 2003; 32(4):382-7. [DOI:10.1093/ageing/32.4.382] [PMID]
Koch T, Webb C. The biomedical construction of ageing: implications for nursing care of older people. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1996; 23(5):954-8. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.10014.x] [PMID]
Skirbekk H, Nortvedt P. Inadequate treatment for elderly patients: Professional norms and tight budgets could cause “ageism” in hospitals. Health Care Analysis. 2014; 22(2):192-201. [DOI:10.1007/s10728-012-0207-2] [PMID]
Rogers SE, Thrasher AD, Miao Y, Boscardin WJ, Smith AK. Discrimination in healthcare settings is associated with disability in older adults: health and retirement study, 2008-2012. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2015; 30(10):1413-20. [DOI:10.1007/s11606-015-3233-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
Bond M, Bowling A, McKee D, Kennelly M, Banning AP, Dudley N. Does ageism affect the management of ischaemic heart disease? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2003; 8(1):40-7. [DOI:10.1258/13558190360468218] [PMID]
de Sao Jose JMS, Amado CAF. On studying ageism in long-term care: A systematic review of the literature. International Psychogeriatrics. 2017; 29(3):373-87. [DOI:10.1017/S1041610216001915] [PMID]
Simkins CL. Ageism’s influence on health care delivery and nursing practice. Journal of Student Nursing Research. 2007; 1(1):1-5.
Usta YY, Demir Y, Yonder M, Yildiz A. Nursing students’ attitudes toward ageism in Turkey. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2012; 54(1):90-3. [DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.002] [PMID]
Vefikulucay Yilmaz D, Terzioglu F. Development and pshycometric evaluation of ageism attitude scale among the university students. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics. 2011; 14(3):259-68.
Polat U, Karadag A, Ulger Z, Demir N. Nurses’ and physicians’ perceptions of older people and attitudes towards older people: Ageism in a hospital in Turkey. Contemporary Nurse. 2014; 48(1):88-97. [DOI:10.1080/10376178.2014.11081930] [PMID]
Fraboni M, Saltstone R, Hughes S. The Fraboni Scale of Ageism (FSA): An attempt at a more precise measure of ageism. Canadian Journal on Aging. 1990; 9(1):56-66. [DOI:10.1017/S0714980800016093]
Schroyen S, Adam S, Marquet M, Jerusalem G, Thiel S, Giraudet AL, et al. Communication of healthcare professionals: Is there ageism? European Journal of Cancer Care. 2018; 27(1):e12780. [DOI:10.1111/ecc.12780] [PMID]
Liu Y-e, While AE, Norman IJ, Ye W. Health professionals’ attitudes toward older people and older patients: A systematic review. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2012; 26(5):397-409. [DOI:10.3109/13561820.2012.702146] [PMID]
Moein M. Moein Persian Dictionary. Tehran: Amir Kabir publication. 1999.
Webster N. Webster’s new collegiate dictionary. 1949. https://www.merriam-webster.com/
Marchiondo LA, Gonzales E, Ran S. Development and validation of the workplace age discrimination scale. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2015; 31(4):493-513. [DOI:10.1007/s10869-015-9425-6]
Palmore E. Response to Commentaries on” The Ageism Survey: First findings”. Gerontologist. 2001; 41(5):580-2. [DOI:10.1093/geront/41.5.580]
Levy BR, Banaji MR. Implicit ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons. Cambridge: The MIT Press; 2002.
Abrams D, Swift HJ, Lamont RA, Drury L. The barriers to and enablers of positive attitudes to ageing and older people, at the societal and individual level: Technical report. Government Office for Science; 2015.
Heikkinen S, Krekula C. Ageism: A useful concept? Sociological Association. 2008; 45(2):18-34.
McGowan T. Ageism and discrimination. Encyclopedia of gerontology: Age, aging and the aged.  Cambridge, Massachusetts: Academic Press; 1996.
Palmore E. Ageism: Negative and positive. United States: Springer Publishing Company; 1999.
Ozdemir O, Bilgili N. Attitudes of Turkish nursing students related to ageism. Journal of Nursing Research. 2016; 24(3):211-6. [DOI:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000131] [PMID]
Reza H. Ageism and indigenous elderly in Bangladesh: Concepts and its applicability. Journal of Ethnic Affairs. 2006; 2(3):14-7.
Liu YE, Norman IJ, While AE. Nurses’ attitudes towards older people and working with older patients: An explanatory model. Journal of Nursing Management. 2015; 23(8):965-73. [DOI:10.1111/jonm.12242] [PMID]
Kogan N. Attitudes toward old people: The development of a scale and an examination of correlates. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1961; 62(1):44-54. [DOI:10.1037/h0048053] [PMID]
Wyman MF, Shiovitz-Ezra S, Bengel J. Ageism in the health care system: Providers, patients, and systems. Berlin, Germany: Contemporary perspectives on ageism. Springer; 2018. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_13]
Voss P, Bodner E, Rothermund K. Ageism: The relationship between age stereotypes and age discrimination. Berlin, Germany: Contemporary perspectives on ageism: Springer; 2018. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-73820-8_2]
Bodner E, Cohen-Fridel S, Yaretzky A. Sheltered housing or community dwelling: quality of life and ageism among elderly people. International Psychogeriatrics. 2011; 23(8):1197-204. [DOI:10.1017/S1041610211001025] [PMID]
Levy BR. Mind matters: Cognitive and physical effects of aging self-stereotypes. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2003; 58(4):203-11. [DOI:10.1093/geronb/58.4.P203] [PMID]


 
Type of Study: Research | Subject: gerontology
Received: 2019/04/29 | Accepted: 2020/02/22 | Published: 2020/04/01

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2021 All Rights Reserved | Iranian Journal of Ageing

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb