Volume 15, Issue 1 (Spring 2020)                   Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing 2020, 15(1): 28-41 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rasafiani M, Sahaf R, Shams A, Vameghi R, Zareian H, Akrami R. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire – the Older Adults Edition. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2020; 15 (1) :28-41
URL: http://salmandj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-1622-en.html
1- Department of Occupational Therapy, Health Research Center, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kuwait University, Kuwait. & Iranian Research Center on Aging, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Iranian Research Center on Aging, Department of Aging, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
3- Department of Sports Management, Sport Science Research Institute (SSRI), Tehran, Iran.
4- Pediatric Neurorehabilitation Research Center, University Of Social Welfare And Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
5- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran. , AkramiR@medsab.ac.ir
Full-Text [PDF 6292 kb]   (1686 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (3145 Views)
Full-Text:   (1003 Views)
1. Introduction
ne of the fundamental issues that engages researchers and professionals in the study of functional consequences at different individual and social levels is the development of appropriate scales for evaluation. If these scales are available internationally, the goal is to select the appropriate scale from the available tools.
The purpose of this selection is to achieve tools that meet the clinical and research needs of researchers at the desired level. In the meantime, researchers are usually looking for tools that cover their intended concepts as accurately and completely as possible.
These concepts are evaluated with the aim of evaluating the effects of injuries and diseases, the effectiveness of strategies, interventions and treatment and rehabilitation programs, and finally clinical decisions to continue, stop or correct these measures.
In the meantime, issues such as the focus of the tool on the target communities, how the tool is used to examine or question the elderly, the psychometric properties of the tool, and the components of the tool are taken into consideration. In recent years, one of the measurable indicators and criteria for determining the needs and improving the health conditions of the elderly is the quality of life index [1, 2].
According to the World Health Organization definition, quality of life includes people’s perception of their position in life in terms of culture, the value system in which they live, their goals, expectations, standards and priorities. Since increasing the quality of life of the elderly leads to an increase in their health status, so researchers study the quality of life of people in the community to determine health.
Therefore, one of the most widely used tools for assessing health status in the world is the WHOQOL, which assesses the quality of life for those aged 18 and over [3]. In general, it is important to note that the accepted validity and reliability of a tool in one language does not guarantee that this feature will remain intact after translation into other languages.
Culture, language and geographical location are factors that should be considered when using a tool in a different environment from where it has spread [9]. Therefore, in this study, in the first stage, we will translate the Persian version of the WHOQOL-OLD and then in the next stage, we will determine the validity and reliability of the Persian version of this questionnaire.
If you get a reliable and valid version of this questionnaire, there would be many benefits to using this tool. For example, the results of these tools can be used to compare the effectiveness and relative value of different treatments in the elderly, research, health policy, health service evaluation, treatment of the elderly, and improving the physician-elderly relationship.
2. Methods & Materials 
The statistical sample of the present study included 300 elderly people aging 60-64 years. Inclusion criteria were: providing a consent form; the ability to communicate in Persian; being 60 years of age or older; and having the appropriate cognitive ability (obtaining a score of greater than and equal to 6 from the Abbreviated Mental Test).
In this study, the standard method of translating the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) project was used to translate the WHOQOL-OLD scale. In order to evaluate the apparent validity of the questionnaire items, five elderly people similar to the target community were asked about the clarity and comprehensibility of the questionnaire and 10 experts were asked about the general form and comprehensibility of the questionnaire items.
Lawshe method was used to determine the content validity. In this method, Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI) are used. In order to evaluate the simultaneous validity, Pearson correlation coefficient of the total score of the WHOQOL-OLD with the total score of the 28-item General Health Questionnaire was analyzed.
In order to evaluate the construct validity of the elderly quality of life questionnaire, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was performed based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using Amos software. Finally, to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaire by test-retest method, 100 elderly people with a two-week interval (this time was extracted based on previous studies) re-completed the WHOQOL-OLD.
3. Results
Apparent validity was used to assess the clarity, simplicity and comprehensibility of each of the questions in the Persian version of the WHOQOL-OLD. Items that had an unfavorable and relatively desirable translation were discussed in a meeting with experienced professors.
In this session, the suggestions of translators were used and the desirability of translating the mentioned items was obtained. To check the validity of the content, Lawshe method was used. The results showed that the content validity scores for all items of the questionnaire ranged from 0.7 to 1, which were confirmed.

4. Conclusion
Then, to obtain the content validity index score, the scores related to the content validity ratio of all questions were added together and divided by the number of questions (24 questions) and the final content validity index number was 0.85, which indicates the acceptable content validity of the WHOQOL-OLD.
To evaluate the simultaneous validity, Pearson correlation coefficient between the total score of the WHOQOL-OLD and the 28-item General Health Questionnaire was examined. The results showed that the correlation coefficient obtained between the two variables was equal to 0.53 (P<0.05); so, the results indicated the simultaneous validity of the WHOQOL questionnaire.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of  the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences.
Funding
This Paper is based on a research project sponsored by the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences and Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences.
Authors' contributions
Conceptualization: Mehdi Rassafiani, Robab Sahaf, Amir Shams; Methodology: Robab Sahaf, Amir Shams; Validation: Mehdi Rassafiani, Robab Sahaf, Amir Shams; Investigation, writing–review & editing: Amir Shams, Hosain Zareian; Writing–original draft: Mehdi Rassafiani, Amir Shams, and Hosain Zareian; Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration: Mehdi Rassafiani, Amir Shams, Rahim Akrami; Funding Acquisition: Mehdi Rassafiani, Rahim Akrami.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.


References
World Health Organization. Preamble to the constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002. https://www.who.int/bulletin/archives/80(12)981.pdf
 Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine. 1998; 26(4):217-38. [DOI:10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002] [PMID]
 Alencar ND, Ferreira MA, Bezerra JC.  Levels of physical activity and quality of life in elderly women practitioners of formal and non-formal physical activities. Acta Medica Lituanica. 16(3-4):155-8. [DOI:10.2478/v10140-009-0023-7]
 Xia P, Li N, Hau KT, Liu Ch, Lu Y. Quality of life of Chinese urban community residents: A psychometric study of the mainland Chinese version of the WHOQOL-BREF. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2012; 12:37. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-12-37] [PMID] [PMCID]
Al-Fayez GA, Ohaeri JU. Profile of subjective quality of life and its correlates in a nation-wide sample of high school students in an Arab setting using the WHOQOL-Bref. BMC Psychiatry. 2011; 11:71. [DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-11-71] [PMID] [PMCID]
Fleck MP, Chachamovich E, Trentini C. Development and validation of the Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Review Saْde Pْblica. 2006; 40(5):785-91. [DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102006000600007] [PMID]
Peel MN, Bartlett PH, Marshall AL. Measuring quality of life in older people: Reliability and validity of WHOQOL-OLD. Australasian Journal on Ageing. 2007; 26:162-7. [DOI:10.1111/j.1741-6612.2007.00249.x]
Bowling A. The Psychometric Properties of the Older People’s Quality of Life Questionnaire, Compared with the CASP-19 and the WHOQOL-OLD. Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research. 2009; 20(3):1-12. [DOI:10.1155/2009/298950] [PMID] [PMCID]
Chachamovich E, Fleck M, Trentini C, Power M. Brazilian WHOQOL-OLD Module version: A Rasch analysis of a new instrument. Review Saْde Pْblica. 2008; 42(2):308-16. [DOI:10.1590/S0034-89102008000200017] [PMID]
Eser S, Saatli G, Eser E, Baydur H, Fidaner C. et al. The reliability and validity of the Turkish Version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-Old). Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2010; 21(1):37-48.
Liu R, Wu S, Hao Y, Gu J, Fang J, Cai N, Zhang J.  The Chinese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2013; 11:156. [DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-11-156] [PMID] [PMCID]
De Luca d’Alessandro E, Bonacci S, Giraldi G.  Aging populations: the health and quality of life of the elderly. Clinical Therapeutics. 2011; 162:13-8.
Homan HA.  Analysis of multivariate data in behavioral research. 5th Edition. Tehran: Peyke Farhang Publication; 2008.
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling. 1999; 6:1-55. [DOI:10.1080/10705519909540118]
Foroughan M, Jafari Z, Bayan Sh, Farahani Gh, Rahgozar M. Validation of Mini- Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the elderly population of Tehran. Advances in Cognitive Science. 2008; 10(2):29-37.
 Nejat S, Montazeri A, Holakouie Naieni K, Mohammad K, Majdzadeh S. [The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire: Translation and validation study of the Iranian version (Persion)]. The quarterly Journal of the School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2006; 4(4):1-12. 
 Malakouti K, Fathollahi P, Mirabzadeh A, Salavati M, Kahani S. [Validation of Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) in Iran (Persion)]. Pejouhesh. 2006; 30(4):361-9. 
Terry PC, Lane AM.  Normative values for the profile of mood states for use with athletic samples. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 2000; 12:93-109. [DOI:10.1080/10413200008404215]
Brown TA.  Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications; 2006.
Lucas-Carrasco R. Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index in elderly. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2012; 66:508-13. [DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2012.02387.x] [PMID]
Liu WY, Hou YJ, Liao HF, Lin YH, Chen YY, Wong AM. A Preliminary study of the development, validity, and reliability of a caregiver questionnaire for the health-related quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. Chang Gung Medical Journal. 2010; 33(6):646-58.
De Melo R, Jْnior E, Souto R, Leo S, Eullio M. Psychometric properties of the complete version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL-OLD): Reduced response scale. Psicologia: Reflexoa e Critica. 2018; 31(4):1-10. [DOI:10.1186/s41155-018-0084-1] [PMID] [PMCID]



 
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Psychology
Received: 2018/08/14 | Accepted: 2019/10/06 | Published: 2020/04/01

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2021 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ageing

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb