Volume 18, Issue 2 (Summer 2023)                   Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing 2023, 18(2): 218-233 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farahbod M, Masoudi Asl I, Tabibi S J, Kamali M. The Status of Rehabilitation in Iran: Barriers and Facilitators. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing 2023; 18 (2) :218-233
URL: http://salmandj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-2573-en.html
1- Department of Health Services Management, Faculty of Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran . , masoudi_1352@yahoo.com
3- Department of Basic Sciences of Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 7956 kb]   (778 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1347 Views)
Full-Text:   (574 Views)
Introduction
Rehabilitation is one of the basic services for the elderly as well as people with disabilities and provides the possibility of participation in the society for these people. In fact, it is one of the main pillars of the health [1]. In old age, people may lose their individual independence to some extent and become dependent in doing their daily living activities. This requires medical and especially rehabilitation services for older people. Rehabilitation provides the possibility of adapting the environment for an elderly person with a disability [23]. Despite the importance of rehabilitation for older people with disability, there are many problems in this field in Iran [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], and few studies have identified the barriers and facilitators of rehabilitation for these people in Iran. Therefore, this study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators of rehabilitation in Iran.

Methods
This is a qualitative study using conventional content analysis method. The study population consists of policy makers and managers in the field of rehabilitation, professors and academic elites active in the field of rehabilitation, as well as people who had experience working in governmental and non-governmental organizations related to rehabilitation in Iran. Of these, 13 participants were selected from different cities of Iran using a purposive sampling method and based on the inclusion criteria. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth interviews with each participant at their workplace from February 19, 2021 to February 19, 2022. The interview started with an open-ended question, followed by probing questions to clarify the concept. After each interview, the recorded content was carefully transcribed.To analyze the data, Graneheim and Lundman’ method of content analysis was used. To increase the reliability of the data obtained from the interviews, Lincoln and Guba’s criteria (trustworthiness, transformability, dependability, and confirmability) were used.

Results
In general, the findings of the study were presented in two general categories of barriers and facilitators. Barriers and facilitators each had 4 sub-categories (Table 1).


One of the important barriers was the high number of rehabilitation trustees. In fact, the lack of a specific place for rehabilitation in Iran’s health system, paying more attention to the concept of treatment and neglecting the aspect of rehabilitation, and providing services by several organizations can cause problems in implementing rehabilitation programs in the country. Another important barrier was the lack of awareness of the officials, especially those in policy-making and decision-making positions for rehabilitation matters. In this regard, it can be said that the disbelief of the municipal managers regarding the importance of adaptations and not paying attention to the needs of people with disabilities in accessing buildings, public places and transportation vehicles can hinder the rehabilitation programs for older people with disability in Iran. Management problems such as the lack of coordination between the health and rehabilitation systems, the existence of disorganization in rehabilitation matters, the lack of justice in the management of rehabilitation affairs, the neglect of rehabilitation in the health system, and the lack of priority of rehabilitation are among the problems that undermine the rehabilitation in Iran.
Raising awareness and creating culture in the field of rehabilitation and disability was one of the facilitators. Another facilitator was improving the insight of officials, health system specialists and policy makers. Educating officials about rehabilitation, improving their knowledge and informing them about the importance of rehabilitation and prioritizing rehabilitation can have a significant impact on facilitating rehabilitation for older people with disability in Iran. Rehabilitation specialists can play an effective role in introducing their field and role in society, and pursuing and solving major problems they face in their career. Another factor that can help to facilitate and promote the status of rehabilitation was using the experiences of other countries. Communication with other countries in the field of rehabilitation, conducting comparative studies and benefiting from the results of other countries’ studies in the field of rehabilitation, increasing scientific interactions with the world and benefiting from the experiences of successful countries in the field of rehabilitation can have an effective role in improving the status of rehabilitation in the country.

Conclusion
There are many problems and barriers to implementing rehabilitation programs for older people with disability in Iran. Removing these barriers and identifying facilitators is one of the most important health goals for the health system of the country. According to the results of this study, the barriers were: High number of rehabilitation trustees, lack of awareness of officials and people, lack of attention to the role of the municipality in rehabilitation, and poor rehabilitation management. On the other hand, facilitators were: Building culture in the field of rehabilitation and disability, improving the insight of officials, the role of rehabilitation specialists, benefiting from the experiences of other countries. It is necessary for rehabilitation managers and policy makers in Iran to pay attention to these barriers and facilitators and, by raising their awareness and knowledge, fixing managerial deficiencies, considering urban development issues and the accessibility of the elderly and people with disabilities to the facilities, promote the rehabilitation status in the country. Rehabilitation specialists in various fields such as occupational therapy, physiotherapy, geriatric medicine and gerontology can help build culture and introduce rehabilitation in the society by cooperating with each other.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

This study followed all the ethical principles of research, including the confidentiality of information and high-hand documents. It should be noted that this research did not have human participants.

Funding
This article is taken from PhD thesis of Mojgan Farahbod approved by the department of Health Services Management, Islamic Azad University of Research and Science Branch.

Authors' contributions
Conceptualization and study design: Mojgan Farahbod and Iravan Masoudi Asl; Methodology: Mojgan Farahbod, Iravan Masoudi Asl and Mohammad Kamali, Data collection, validation, analysis, research, draft writing, Reviewing, editing and finalizing the article: All Authors.

Conflicts of interest
All authors declared no conflict of interest.


References
  1. Khasnabis C, Heinicke Motsch K, Achu K, Al Jubah K, Brodtkorb S, Chervin P, et al. Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010. [PMID]
  2. World Health Organization. WHO global disability action plan 2014-2021: Better health for all people with disability. Geneva:  World Health Organization; 2015. [Link]
  3. Organization WH. [World report on disability 2011 (Portuguese)]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011. [Link]
  4. Kim D, Shin H, Kim CY. Equitable access to health care for the elderly in South Korea: Is income-related inequality in health care utilization more pronounced? Research on Aging. 2012; 34(4):475-96. [DOI:10.1177/0164027511423538]
  5. Rimmer JH, Rowland JL. Health promotion for people with disabilities: Implications for empowering the person and promoting disability-friendly environments. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2008; 2(5):409-20. [DOI:10.1177/1559827608317397]
  6. Abdi K, Arab M, Rashidian A, Kamali M, Khankeh HR, Farahani FK. Exploring barriers of the health system to rehabilitation services for people with disabilities in Iran: A qualitative study. Electronic Physician. 2015; 7(7):1476-85. [DOI:10.19082/1476] [PMID] [PMCID]
  7. Kielhofner G. Research in occupational therapy: Methods of inquiry for enhancing practice. Philadelphia: Davis Company; 2006. [Link]
  8. Jafari T. [Anonymous elderly: The social position of the elderly in the family (Persian)]. Tehran: Besharat Publications; 2018. [Link]
  9. Shahdadi H, Zafar Danesh P. [Rehabilitation in the elderly (Persin)]. Tehran: Boshra Publication; 2019. [Link]
  10. Soltani S, Khosravi B, Salehiniya H. Prevalence of disability in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2015; 44(10):1436-7. [Link]
  11. Soltani S, Khosravi B, Salehiniya H. Prevalence of intellectual disability in Iran: Toward a new conceptual framework in data collection. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2015; 20(7):714-5. [DOI:10.4103/1735-1995.166234] [PMID] [PMCID]
  12. Farahbod M, Masoudi Asl I, Tabibi S J, Kamali M. [Comparing the rehabilitation structures in the health systems of Iran, Germany, Japan, Canada, Turkey, and South Africa (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2023; 24(1):96-113. [Link]
  13. WHO. Rehabilitation in health systems: Guide for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. [Link]
  14. Mohamadi F, Madah SB. [Theoretical foundation of rehabilitation nursing (Persian)]. Tehran: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences; 2006. [Link]
  15. Mauk KL. Rehabilitation nursing: A contemporary approach to practice. Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012. [Link]
  16. Soleimanvandi Azar N, Mohaqeqi Kamal SH, Sajadi H, Ghaedamini Harouni GR, Karimi S, Foroozan AS. [Barriers and facilitators of the outpatient health service use by the elderly (Persian)]. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2020; 15(3):258-77. [DOI:10.32598/sija.15.3.551.3]
  17. Kamali M. An overview of the situation of the disabled in Iran. In: Moor A, Kornblet, editors. Advancing the rights of persons with disabilities: A US-Iran dialogue on law. Policy, and Advocacy. Washington, DC: Stimson Cente 2011;  [Link]
  18. Soltani S, Takian A, Sari AA, Majdzadeh R, Kamali M. Financial barriers to access to health Services for Adult People with disability in Iran: The challenges for universal health coverage. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 2019; 48(3):508-15. [DOI:10.18502/ijph.v48i3.895] [PMID] [PMCID]
  19. Iravani M, Riahi L, Abdi K, Tabibi SJ. [A comparative study of the rehabilitation services systems for people with disabilities (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2020; 21(4):544-63. [DOI:10.32598/RJ.21.4.3225.1]
  20. Najafi Z, Abdi K, Khanjani M S, Dalvand H, Amiri M. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Qualitative exploration of barriers to the implementation of articles 25 (health) and 26 (rehabilitation) in Iran. Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran. 2021; 35(1):78-86. [DOI:10.47176/mjiri.35.10]
  21. Hwang K, Johnston M, Tulsky D, Wood K, Dyson-Hudson T, Komaroff E. Access and coordination of health care service for people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 2009; 20(1):28-34. [DOI:10.1177/1044207308315564]
  22. Vincent C, Deaudelin I, Robichaud L, Rousseau J, Viscogliosi C, Talbot LR, et al. Rehabilitation needs for older adults with stroke living at home: Perceptions of four populations. BMC Geriatrics. 2007; 7:20. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2318-7-20] [PMID] [PMCID]
  23. Mangset M, Tor Erling Dahl, Førde R, Wyller TB. ‘We’re just sick people, nothing else’:... factors contributing to elderly stroke patients’ satisfaction with rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2008; 22(9):825-35. [DOI:10.1177/0269215508091872] [PMID]
  24. Govender R. The barriers and challenges to Health Promotion in Africa. South African Family Practice. 2005; 47(10):54. [DOI:10.1080/20786204.2005.10873303]
  25. Baru R, Acharya A, Acharya S, Kumar AS, Nagaraj K. Inequities in access to health services in India: Caste, class and region. Economic and Political Weekly. 2010; 45(38):49-58. [Link]
  26. Srivastava D, McGuire A. Patient access to health care and medicines across low-income countries. Social Science & Medicine. 2015; 133:21-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.021] [PMID]
  27. Callahan ST, Cooper WO. Access to health care for young adults with disabling chronic conditions. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 2006; 160(2):178-82. [DOI:10.1001/archpedi.160.2.178] [PMID]
  28. Mehrdad N, Oskoie F, Fatemi N, Ebrahimi H, Rezaie M. [Qualitative content analysis (Persian)]. Tehran: Boshra publication; 2013. [Link]
  29. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today. 2004; 24(2):105-12. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001] [PMID]
  30. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. [Link]
  31. Zare H. [Basic health insurance: principles, Structure, Coverage and Regulation (Persian)]. Tehran: Medical Services Insurance Organization Publication; 2006. [Link]
  32. Jahanbin P, Abdi K, Khanjani MS, Hosseini MA. [Exploring barriers of teamwork in providing rehabilitation services: A qualitative content analysis (Persian)]. Archives of Rehabilitatio. 2019; 20(3):210-21. [DOI:10.32598/rj.20.3.210]
  33. Kleinitz P, Walji F, Vichetra K, Nimul O, Mannava P. Barriers to and facilitators of health services for people with disabilities in Cambodia. Ausaid Knowledge Hubs For Health. 2012; 1-16. [Link]
  34. Fisher KR, Shang X. Access to health and therapy services for families of children with disabilities in China. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2013; 35(25):2157-63. [DOI:10.3109/09638288.2013.770566] [PMID]
  35. Van Rooy G, Amadhila EM, Mufune P, Swartz L, Mannan H, MacLachlan M. Perceived barriers to accessing health services among people with disabilities in rural northern Namibia. Disability & Society. 2012; 27(6):761-75. [DOI:10.1080/09687599.2012.686877]
  36. Amini R, Mohammadi Shahboulaghi F, Norouzi Tabrizi K, Setareh Forouzan A. [Facilitators and barriers in community dwelling older adult social participation: A qualitative study (Persian)]. Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2021; 16 (2):172-87. [DOI:10.32598/sija.16.2.3052.1]
  37. Abdi K, Arab M, Khankeh HR, Kamali M, Rashidian A, Farahani FK, et al. Challenges in providing rehabilitation services for people with disabilities in Iran: A qualitative study. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research. 2016; 13(4):1-11. [DOI:10.9734/BJMMR/2016/23337] 
  38. Marlow E, White MC, Chesla CA. Barriers and facilitators: Parolees’ perceptions of community health care. Journal of Correctional Health Care. 2010; 16(1):17-26. [DOI:10.1177/1078345809348201] [PMID] [PMCID]
  39. Ghiasvand H, Mohamadi E, Olyaeemanesh A, Kiani MM, Armoon B, Takian A. Health equity in Iran: A systematic review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2021; 35:51. [DOI:10.47176/mjiri.35.51] [PMID] [PMCID]
  40. Nooraiee Motlagh S, Saber Mahani A, Barooni M, Asadi Lari M, Vaez Mahdavi MR, Hadian M. [Determining factors related to health services utilization (Persian)]. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015; 21(127):61-72. [Link]
  41. Latifian M, Baniasad A, Kamali M. [Investigating the social dimensions of disability: A systematic review (Persian)]. Journal of Social Work Research. 2021; 7(26):53-101. [Link]

 
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Rehabilitation Management
Received: 2023/01/29 | Accepted: 2023/02/15 | Published: 2023/07/01

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ageing

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb